Improve council rules #63
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: LemmyNet/lemmy#63
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "improve-council-rules"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I have decided to rewrite this a bit and make things clearer.
Please review @dessalines @fruechtchen @StaticallyTypedRice
Forgot to include opencollective, and the different matrix chats.
left some comments
@ -7,4 +8,0 @@
### Process
- Anything is open for discussion
- Voting done through matrix chat reacts (thumbs up/thumbs down)
- Require a simple majority for votes. (Maybe 2/3rds for more debated decisions).
"anything is open for discussion" and "simple majority" or something like that is lost, i like the former. The majority-thing is good, but i don't know if that's too formally defined?
The "anything is open for discussion" feels a bit pointless to me, I tried to put it into more concrete terms instead.
Its important for me, as it is the indicator that i am an admin with "equal rights". Of course, it would be kinda pointless, when we want to decide something, have a majority, but one admin has super-admin rights and says: "no, this is not open for discussion".
(I don't mean a "veto" here)
How about this: "any issue concerning the items below can get voted on, if a council member asks for it"
Should be fixed.
@ -12,0 +20,4 @@
explain their position.
- Discussion should be taken with the goal of reaching a compromise that is acceptable for
everyone.
- After the discussion, voting is done through Matrix reacts and must stay open for at least
Matrix reacts -> that might be confusing, "voting trough matrix emojis" might be more clear?
Also, some neutral reaction is missing here, which expresses "i don't care" and not "i like it" as a thumbs up.
Right, added those.
neutral vote is missing. This was the case for instance on the domain-thing of lemmy. i did not care about the exact domain name, altough i understood everything.
a neutral vote is important, because both a thumbs up ("i like it") and thumbs down ("i don't like it") are wrong in this case.
@ -24,2 +33,2 @@
- git repo including mirrors (on github, gitea, etc)
- Any official accounts of the Lemmy project, for example the Mastodon account or the Liberapay account
- Moderation and conflict resolution on:
- [dev.lemmy.ml](https://dev.lemmy.ml/)
you might wanna explain here, why you want to exclude communism.lemmy.ml
-> for instance: "communism.lemmy.ml is considered a private project by the two main devs" or something
Not sure if we should even mention it here, its a separate instance with a separate admin team. What do you think @dessalines?
@ -10,2 +8,2 @@
- Require a simple majority for votes. (Maybe 2/3rds for more debated decisions).
- Once a decision is reached democratically, the dicision is binding and all group members have to follow it
Most of the time, we keep each other up to date through the Matrix chat, and take informal
decisions on uncontroversial issues. For example, a user clearly violating the site rules
Pls remove these line breaks.
I know you dont like them, but editing text really sucks when its all in a single long line.
@ -26,1 +41,4 @@
- [Liberapay](https://liberapay.com/Lemmy/)
- [Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/dessalines)
- Council membership changes
- Changes to these rules
These look good, much better organized. Thx
Looks good to me.
@ -30,0 +53,4 @@
- All members of the Lemmy council have equal voting power, with the option of abstaining.
- Decisions should be reached unanimously, or nearly so. If this is not possible, at least
2/3 of votes must be in favour for the motion to pass.
- Once a decision is reached in this way, every member needs to abide by it.
Could you remove these line breaks.
Be sure to remove link breaks before merge.