Improve council rules #63

Manually merged
nutomic merged 51 commits from improve-council-rules into master 2020-07-07 12:02:36 +00:00
Owner

I have decided to rewrite this a bit and make things clearer.

Please review @dessalines @fruechtchen @StaticallyTypedRice

I have decided to rewrite this a bit and make things clearer. Please review @dessalines @fruechtchen @StaticallyTypedRice
Author
Owner

Forgot to include opencollective, and the different matrix chats.

Forgot to include opencollective, and the different matrix chats.
fruechtchen requested changes 2020-06-26 07:29:11 +00:00
fruechtchen left a comment
First-time contributor

left some comments

left some comments
@ -7,4 +8,0 @@
### Process
- Anything is open for discussion
- Voting done through matrix chat reacts (thumbs up/thumbs down)
- Require a simple majority for votes. (Maybe 2/3rds for more debated decisions).
First-time contributor

"anything is open for discussion" and "simple majority" or something like that is lost, i like the former. The majority-thing is good, but i don't know if that's too formally defined?

"anything is open for discussion" and "simple majority" or something like that is lost, i like the former. The majority-thing is good, but i don't know if that's too formally defined?
Author
Owner

The "anything is open for discussion" feels a bit pointless to me, I tried to put it into more concrete terms instead.

The "anything is open for discussion" feels a bit pointless to me, I tried to put it into more concrete terms instead.
First-time contributor

Its important for me, as it is the indicator that i am an admin with "equal rights". Of course, it would be kinda pointless, when we want to decide something, have a majority, but one admin has super-admin rights and says: "no, this is not open for discussion".

(I don't mean a "veto" here)

Its important for me, as it is *the* indicator that i am an admin with "equal rights". Of course, it would be kinda pointless, when we want to decide something, have a majority, but one admin has super-admin rights and says: "no, this is not open for discussion". (I don't mean a "veto" here)
Author
Owner

How about this: "any issue concerning the items below can get voted on, if a council member asks for it"

How about this: "any issue concerning the items below can get voted on, if a council member asks for it"
Author
Owner

Should be fixed.

Should be fixed.
nutomic marked this conversation as resolved
@ -12,0 +20,4 @@
explain their position.
- Discussion should be taken with the goal of reaching a compromise that is acceptable for
everyone.
- After the discussion, voting is done through Matrix reacts and must stay open for at least
First-time contributor

Matrix reacts -> that might be confusing, "voting trough matrix emojis" might be more clear?

Matrix reacts -> that might be confusing, "voting trough matrix emojis" might be more clear?
First-time contributor

Also, some neutral reaction is missing here, which expresses "i don't care" and not "i like it" as a thumbs up.

Also, some neutral reaction is missing here, which expresses "i don't care" and not "i like it" as a thumbs up.
Author
Owner

Right, added those.

Right, added those.
First-time contributor

neutral vote is missing. This was the case for instance on the domain-thing of lemmy. i did not care about the exact domain name, altough i understood everything.

a neutral vote is important, because both a thumbs up ("i like it") and thumbs down ("i don't like it") are wrong in this case.

neutral vote is missing. This was the case for instance on the domain-thing of lemmy. i did not care about the exact domain name, altough i understood everything. a neutral vote is important, because both a thumbs up ("i like it") and thumbs down ("i don't like it") are wrong in this case.
@ -24,2 +33,2 @@
- git repo including mirrors (on github, gitea, etc)
- Any official accounts of the Lemmy project, for example the Mastodon account or the Liberapay account
- Moderation and conflict resolution on:
- [dev.lemmy.ml](https://dev.lemmy.ml/)
First-time contributor

you might wanna explain here, why you want to exclude communism.lemmy.ml

-> for instance: "communism.lemmy.ml is considered a private project by the two main devs" or something

you might wanna explain here, why you want to exclude communism.lemmy.ml -> for instance: "communism.lemmy.ml is considered a private project by the two main devs" or something
Author
Owner

Not sure if we should even mention it here, its a separate instance with a separate admin team. What do you think @dessalines?

Not sure if we should even mention it here, its a separate instance with a separate admin team. What do you think @dessalines?
dessalines reviewed 2020-06-26 15:19:45 +00:00
@ -10,2 +8,2 @@
- Require a simple majority for votes. (Maybe 2/3rds for more debated decisions).
- Once a decision is reached democratically, the dicision is binding and all group members have to follow it
Most of the time, we keep each other up to date through the Matrix chat, and take informal
decisions on uncontroversial issues. For example, a user clearly violating the site rules
Owner

Pls remove these line breaks.

Pls remove these line breaks.
Author
Owner

I know you dont like them, but editing text really sucks when its all in a single long line.

I know you dont like them, but editing text really sucks when its all in a single long line.
dessalines reviewed 2020-06-26 15:22:53 +00:00
@ -26,1 +41,4 @@
- [Liberapay](https://liberapay.com/Lemmy/)
- [Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/dessalines)
- Council membership changes
- Changes to these rules
Owner

These look good, much better organized. Thx

These look good, much better organized. Thx
nutomic marked this conversation as resolved
Owner

Looks good to me.

Looks good to me.
dessalines reviewed 2020-07-01 13:28:18 +00:00
@ -30,0 +53,4 @@
- All members of the Lemmy council have equal voting power, with the option of abstaining.
- Decisions should be reached unanimously, or nearly so. If this is not possible, at least
2/3 of votes must be in favour for the motion to pass.
- Once a decision is reached in this way, every member needs to abide by it.
Owner

Could you remove these line breaks.

Could you remove these line breaks.
Owner

Be sure to remove link breaks before merge.

Be sure to remove link breaks before merge.
nutomic manually merged commit aaa536b454 into master 2020-07-07 12:02:36 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Label
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: LemmyNet/lemmy#63
No description provided.